What Reformation?

March 16, 2010

Tuesday Re-mix – This is a popular post from last year, updated and resubmitted for your consideration and comments.

If one of the objectives of the Reformation was to blur the line between the two “classes” of church members (clergy and laymen) which existed at the time, then I think Martin Luther would be terribly disappointed in the traditional American church of today.  We talk a lot about the “priesthood of the believer” and Spiritual gifts in every Christian and how we are all ministers, but the ministerial structure of our traditional protestant churches betrays us.  reformationWe still have two classes of members: professional Christians (ministerial staff) and the rest of us.  And, unfortunately, the rest of us are most often content to sit back and wait to be entertained and fed and ministered to by the professional Christians.  Any attempts by Luther and friends to truly mobilize the laity of the church seem to have failed pretty miserably by most standards.

Okay, okay.  Maybe it’s not quite that bad.  But even among our healthiest churches, there is often this understanding, this “norm” that has the professional Christians doing the work (and getting paid for it) and the rest of us just coming up under them and supporting that work however we can.  Our church offices and support staff are often geared toward that same paradigm.  Our budgets, our programming, our communications strategies, virtually our entire infrastructure in the traditional evangelical church is bent toward this same attitude of paying our ministers to do ministry so that we don’t have to.

Because of this, my heart aches for the traditional church.  I know there are plenty of non-traditional churches out there who are experimenting with other models…churches filled with people who have fled the traditional church in order to pursue the excitement of those experiments.  But that is not my desire.  I  love the church too much to leave it behind.  What I want is to change it from within.  Am I dreaming?  Is that even possible?

If I am currently in a traditional church, is it naive of me to dream of becoming a church where every layman is encouraged to find a ministry which can use his/her Spiritual gifts and training?  Is it pie-in-the-sky thinking to envision a church which is specifically structured to support hundreds, even thousands of lay-led ministries?  Is it so silly to think of the church as an “open system”, structured to continuously embrace new ministries born in the hearts of laymen who love the Lord so much they simply cannot help but find ways to make a difference in eternity?  Or must we remain a “closed system” where a person must be a member 5-10 years before he/she is finally given enough “leash” to actually be supported in ministry?

I want to say to every staff member I know, “How many things will you do today which could be done as well or better by a knowledgeable layman in your church?  Instead of doing it yourself, why not recruit someone to do it, so that you can do the things that you are called to do?”  What if, rather than pay professional Christians to do ministry, we pay them to help US do ministry?  How much more ministry might happen then?

I’m not given to rants, not very often, but I am growing weary of the country club mentality I find in so many of our otherwise good, traditional churches.  These are good, Godly people.  They can make a difference in this world.  But their expectations have been so diluted by a non-responsive institutional structure, it will take something truly extraordinary to shift their thinking.  It will take a revolution…one similar, no, one exactly like the one Jesus intended when He spoke of his church.  I think it can happen, not only outside the church but from within the church as well.  Am I so wrong about that?

© Blake Coffee

Permissions: You are permitted and encouraged to reproduce and distribute this material in any format provided that you do not alter the wording in any way and do not charge a fee beyond the cost of reproduction. For web posting, a link to this document on this website is preferred. Any exceptions to the above must be approved by Blake Coffee.

Please include the following statement on any distributed copy: © Blake Coffee. Website: churchwhisperer.com

2 thoughts on “What Reformation?

  1. Henry Gomez

    Great article. Funny thing is that after reading your article I realized that I am part of a traditional church, but a first century traditional church, the kind there was before Constantine in 300 AD made a few changes.

    1 Corinthians 14:26 NIV
    26 What then shall we say, brothers? When you come together, everyone has a hymn, or a word of instruction, a revelation, a tongue or an interpretation. All of these must be done for the strengthening of the church. 27 If anyone speaks in a tongue, two–or at the most three–should speak, one at a time, and someone must interpret. 28 If there is no interpreter, the speaker should keep quiet in the church and speak to himself and God. 29 Two or three prophets should speak, and the others should weigh carefully what is said. 30 And if a revelation comes to someone who is sitting down, the first speaker should stop. 31 For you can all prophesy in turn so that everyone may be instructed and encouraged. 32 The spirits of prophets are subject to the control of prophets.

    We actually describe ourselves as non-traditional but we are very traditional and everyone in our congregation has the opportunity to share their gift.

    In Praise of Our Magnificent!!! and Loving God!!!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *